Explaining the Role of National Participant Geospatial Information System in the Effectiveness of Urban Services with a New Approach
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24114/jg.v15i1.38992Abstract
This article is written with a new approach of an integrated system, under the title of National Participatory Geographical Information System, which is introduced. This approach originated from people's thoughts in dealing with national and transnational issues and issues in the form of participation, which has challenged human evaluations and needs to educate everyone. Now, researchers, stakeholders, and government officials' primary concern are finding ways to increase public participation in these programs. Especially digital cities have been made available in line with all the angles of virtual planning. In the coming years, how to deal with technology in the framework of a coordinated information system dependent on space-time-place is very important. After platform creation, it must be managed and can be used and developed within the requirements management framework. A case study was chosen to prove the applicability of this study. The problem of the wrong cycle is a general process with the aim of its educational structural correctionKeywords: New Geography, Education NPGIS, Virtual Cities, Next GenerationReferences
Amelia, C., & Prananto, A. (2015). Reflecting design thinking: a case study of the process of designing dashboards. Journal of Systems and Information Technology, 17(3), 286“306. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/JSIT-03-2015-0018
Abbruzzese, J. (2021). This ethereum-based project could change how we think about digital art". Mashable. April 6, 2021. https://mashable.com/article/cryptopunks-ethereum-art-collectibles
Baron, S., Miller, K., & Tallant, J. (2022). Out of Time: A Philosophical Study of Timelessness. Oxford University Press.
Beck, U. (1992). Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity. In Economic Geography (Vol. 69, Issue 4). Sage Publications. https://doi.org/10.2307/143601
Bibri, S. E. (2018). Smart Sustainable Cities of the Future The Untapped Potential of Big Data Analytics and Context-Aware Computing for Advancing Sustainability. In Urban Book Series. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73981-6_10
Choi, S. Y., Abel, M., Siqi-Liu, A., & Umanath, S. (2021). National Identity Can be Comprised of More Than Pride: Evidence From Collective Memories of Americans and Germans. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 10(1), 117“130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2020.09.004
Denwood, T., Huck, J. J., & Lindley, S. (2022). Participatory Mapping: a systematic review and open science framework for future research. Annals of the American Association of Geographers, 112(8), 2324-2343.
Dunn, C. E. (2007). Participatory GIS - A people™s GIS? Progress in Human Geography, 31(5), 616“637. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132507081493
Fallah, M., Vagharfard, H., Farajzadeh, M., & Kheslat, A. N. (2014). Assessment of Spatial multi-criteria decision-making with process of the artificial neural networks Method to Site Selection of the Wastewater Treatment Plant (Case study: Qeshm Island). International Journal of Advanced Biological and Biomedical Research, 2(6), 2061“2066.
Friedman, J., Hastie, T., & Tibshirani, R. (2010). Regularization Paths for Generalized Linear Models via Coordinate Descent. Journal of Statistical Software, 33(1), 1“22. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v033.i01
Hosch, W. L. (2021). Web 2.0. Encyclopedia Britannica. Retrieved December 12, 2021, https://www.britannica.com/topic/Web-20
Indrajit, A., Van Loenen, B., & Van Oosterom, P. (2019). Assessing spatial information themes in the spatial information infrastructure for participatory urban planning monitoring: Indonesian cities. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 8(7). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi8070305
Jakob, N. (1993). Usability Engineering. AP Professional.
Johnson, M. S., Adams, V. M., Byrne, J., & Harris, R. M. B. (2022). The benefits of Q + PPGIS for coupled human-natural systems research: A systematic review. Ambio, 51(8), 1819“1836. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-022-01709-z
Livni, E. (2021). Welcome to Web3 What's That ?. The New York Times, Archived from the original on December 28, 2021., Retrieved December 16, 2021, https:// www.nytimes.com/2021/12/05/business/dealbook/what-is-web3.html
Mattingly, W. A., Kelley, R. R., Wiemken, T. L., Chariker, J. H., Peyrani, P., Guinn, B. E., Binford, L. E., Buckner, K., & Ramirez, J. (2015). Real-time enrollment dashboard for multisite clinical trials. Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications, 1, 17“21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conctc.2015.09.001
McCall, M. K. (2019). P(P)GIS, Participatory Mapping and Participatory Cartography in the Urban Context Utilising Local Spatial Knowledge A Bibliography. Morelia: UNAM, CIGA. (New Ed.), August 2015, 1“99.
Miller, R. (2021). The irrational exuberance of web3 “ TechCrunch. TechCrunch. December 14, Retrieved December 16, 2021, https://techcrunch.com/2021/12/14/the-irrational-exuberance-of-web3
Radil, S. M., & Anderson, M. B. (2019). Rethinking PGIS: Participatory or (post)political GIS? Progress in Human Geography, 43(2), 195“213. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132517750774
RodrÃguez, F. D., Acuña, S. T., & Juristo, N. (2015). Design and programming patterns for implementing usability functionalities in web applications. Journal of Systems and Software, 105, 107“124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2015.04.023
Roose, K. (2021). Crypto Is Cool. Now Get on the Yacht. The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the original on November 5, 2021. Retrieved November 9, 2021, https://www.nytimes.com/2021/11/05/technology/nft-nyc-metaverse.html
Saleh, A., Bintiisamil, R., & Fabil, N. B. (2015). Extension of Pacmad Model for Usability Evaluation Metrics Using Goal Question Metrics (GQM) Approach. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Information Technology, 79(1), 90“100.
Silva, C. N. (2013). Open Source Urban Governance: Crowdsourcing, Neogeography, VGI, and Citizen Science. Citizen E-Participation in Urban Governance: Crowdsourcing and Collaborative Creativity, 1“370. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-4169-3
Statistical Yearbook of Iran. (2018). national portal of statistics Population of cities of Iran, Statistics Center of Iran, https://www.amar.org.ir/english/Iran-Statistical-Yearbook
Tabatabai, A., Zarei, B., Dastjerdi, H. K., & Ahmadi, A. (2022). Investigating the process of formation of national identity in Iran , in terms of territorialism. Journal of Geography, 20(72). https://doi.org/http://dor.net/dor/20.1001.1.27833739.1401.20.72.2.8 Investigating
TrÄek, D. (2022). Cultural heritage preservation by using blockchain technologies. Heritage Science, 10(1), 1“11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40494-021-00643-9
Urban Sari with 6 Thousand Years Old and Historical Memory. (2018). ttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sari,_Iran
United Nations. (2015). Activities Report Activities Un-Habitat Global Activities Report 2015. United Nations Human Settlements Programme (UN-Habitat).
United Nations. (2019). World Urbanization Prospects. In Demographic ResearchDepartment of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division. New York: United Nations. https://population.un.org/wup/Publications/Files/WUP2018-Report.pdf
Valánszki, I., Kristensen, L. S., Jombach, S., Ladányi, M., Kovács, K. F., & Fekete, A. (2022). Assessing Relations between Cultural Ecosystem Services, Physical Landscape Features and Accessibility in Central-Eastern Europe: A PPGIS Empirical Study from Hungary. Sustainability (Switzerland), 14(2), 1“20. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14020754
Wessels, B. (2010). The role of local agencies in developing community participation in e-government and e-public services. In Handbook of research on e-planning: ICTs for urban development and monitoring (pp. 286-305). IGI Global.
Zarrin, J., Wen Phang, H., Babu Saheer, L., & Zarrin, B. (2021). Blockchain for decentralization of internet: prospects, trends, and challenges. Cluster Computing, 24(4), 2841“2866. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10586-021-03301-8
