PENGARUH STRATEGI PEMBELAJARAN DAN MOTIVASI BERPRESTASI TERHADAP HASIL BELAJAR MATEMATIKA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24114/jpbp.v18i3.4292Keywords:
Strategy, Motivate, Achievement, MathematicsAbstract
This research aim to know of difference between result learn the studentmathematics taught by using strategy of study cooperative type STAD and result oflearning student mathematics by using strategy of study ekspositori. The method isquasi experiment. This research is executed SMP Negeri 11 Medan. Instrumentused together the data test result of learning and enquette motivate to haveachievement. Technique analysis the data used by ANAVA 2x2. The result analysisof research indicate that result learn the student mathematics taught by usingstrategy study of higher type STAD cooperative than result learn the studentmathematics taught by using strategy of study ekspositori (Fcalculate = 4,698 >Ftabel = 3,96; there are difference which signifikan of result learn the studentmathematics having high achievement motivation with the student having lowmotivation achievement, (Fcalculate = 27,9 > Ftabel = 3,96), and there areinteraction between study strategy and motivate to have achievement in influencingresult learn the student mathematics (Fcalculate = 12,45 > Ftabel = 3,96). Result ofinferential research that strategy study of better type STAD cooperative taught tostudent having motivation have high achievement and good study ekspositoristrategy used to student having motivation have low achievement and there areinteraction of study strategy and motivate the to have achievement.References
Arends, R. I. (1998) Learning to teach. New
York. Mc Graw Hill Companies.
Arikunto, S. (1999). Prosedur penelitian, suatu
pendekatan praktek. Jakarta. Rineka
Cipta.
Dick, W. & Carey, L. (1985). The systematic
design of instruction. Illions: Scott
Foresman and Company.
Gagne, R. M. (1985). The condition of
learning. New York. Halt Rinahart
and Wiston.
Hamalik, O. (2003). Perencanaan pengajaran.
Jakarta. Buki Aksara.
Ibrahim M. (2002). Pembelajaran kooperatif.
Surabaya. UNESA. University Press.
Johnson, D. W. & Johnson, R. T. (1989).
Cooperation and competition theory
and research. Edina, MN: Interaction
Book Company.
Joyce, B., Weil, M. (1996). Models of teaching.
th ed., Boston. Allyn & Bacon.
Lie, A. (2004). Cooverative leraning. Jakarta.
PT. Grasindo.
Nur M. (1999). Teori belajar. Surabaya.
UNESA. University Press.
Nasution, N. (1987). Evaluasi pengajaran.
Jakarta. PPUT
Rasyid, M. (2004). Efektifitas strategi
pembelajaran kooperatif dan
kemampuan awal terhadap hasil
belajar fisika. Medan. Tesis PPS
Unimed.
Stephen, K., Robert, E. R. (1980). Problem
solving in school mathematics.
National Council of Teachers of
Mathematis.
Slavin, E. R. (1995). Cooperative learning.
America Serikat : All Yu and Bacon.
Sudjana. (2002). Metode statistika. Bandung
Tarsito.
Sudjana, N. (2005). Penilaian hasil proses
belajar mengajar. Bandung. PT
Remaja Rosdakarya.
Surianta, I. M. (2008). Penerapan model
pembelajaran kooperatif tipe STAD
dengan media VCD untuk
meningkatkan prestasi belajar
matematika. http: /www.google.com.
(Diakses 18 Januari 2009).
Uno, B. H. (2008). Teori motivasi dan
pengukuran. Jakarta. Bumi Aksara
Winkel, W. S. (2005). Psikologi pengajaran.
Yogyakarta. Media Abadi.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
a. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
b. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
c. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).