Konflik dan Ujaran Kebencian di Twitter (Studi Tentang Hashtag #2019TetapJokowi and #2019GantiPresiden Periode Januari-Februari 2019)

Authors

  • Anni’mah Nurul F Universitas Sebelas Maret Surakarta
  • Nurhadi Nurhadi Universitas Sebelas Maret Surakarta
  • Sigit Pranawa Universitas Sebelas Maret Surakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24114/jupiis.v12i1.16083

Keywords:

functions of conflict, hate speech, twitter, virtual world

Abstract

This research aims at understanding and explaing conflicts that take place in the virtual world. Twitter is chosen as a sample because it is one of the most widely used social media many so-called netizens use both for positive and negative purposes. One of the negative effects that twitter brings about is rampant hate speech.  Data is collected by shooting screen that contain hashtag #2019gantipresiden and #2019tetapjokowi. Perspective used in this research is Lewis Coser™s conflict theory. Unlike other researches that focus on the impact of internet-mediated interaction, this reseach offers a new perspective that considers virtual world a space where each individual interacting in it gets involved in a negotiation process with other individual or a group of individuals. Conclusions drawn from this reseach are as follows : (1) if it comes to conflict, the nature of virtual - real worlds relation is diadic one; (2) things that occur in the virtual world can be managed to be realized in the real world and vice versa; (3) virtual world is an imaginary space constructed by groups of individuals due to interaction barrier in the real world.

Author Biographies

Anni’mah Nurul F, Universitas Sebelas Maret Surakarta

Program Studi Pendidikan Sosiologi dan Antropologi, Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan,

Nurhadi Nurhadi, Universitas Sebelas Maret Surakarta

Program Studi Pendidikan Sosiologi dan Antropologi, Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan,

Sigit Pranawa, Universitas Sebelas Maret Surakarta

Program Studi Pendidikan Sosiologi dan Antropologi, Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan,

References

Barnidge, M., Kim, B., Sherrill, L.A., Luknar, Z., and Zhang, J. (2019). œPerceived Exposure to and Avoidance of Hate Speech in Various Communication Settings. Telematics and Informatics 44(August):101263.

Bliuc, A.M., Faulkner, N., Jakubowicz, A., and McGarty, C., (2018). œOnline Networks of Racial Hate: A Systematic Review of 10 years of Research on Cyber-Racism. Computers in Human Behavior 87(May):75“86.

Chetty, N., and Alathur, S., (2018). œHate Speech Review in the Context of Online Social Networks. Aggression and Violent Behavior 40(March 2017):108“18.

Coser, L.A. (1956). The Functions of Social Conflict. Oxon: Routledge.

Dahrendorf, R. (1959). Class Conflict in Industrial Society. Stanford CA: Stanford University Press.

Damanik, E.L (2018). Hashtag #2019GantiPresiden: Sentimen Anti-petahana dan Orientasi Politik Pemilih Pemula menghadapi Pilpres 2019 di Pematangsiantar. JPPUMA: Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan dan Sosial Politik UMA (Journal of Governance and Political UMA), 6 (2): 166-176.

Dashti, A.A., Ali A. Al-Kandari, and Hamed H. Al-Abdullah. (2015). œThe Influence of Sectarian and Tribal Discourse in Newspapers Readers™ Online Comments about Freedom of Expression, Censorship and National Unity in Kuwait. Telematics and Informatics 32(2):245“53.

Doni, F.R. (2017). œPerilaku Penggunaan Media Sosial Pada KalanganRemaja. Indonesian Journal on Software Engineering 3(2):15“23.

ÄorÄ‘ević, J.P. (2020). œThe Sociocognitive Dimension of Hate Speech in Readers™ Comments on Serbian News Websites. Discourse, Context and Media 33.

Engelke, M. (2002). œThe Problem of Belief : Evans-Pritchard and Victor Turner on ˜The Inner Life.™ Anthropology Today 18(6):3“8.

Fangen, K. and Holter, C.R.. (2019). œThe Battle for Truth: How Online Newspaper Commenters Defend Their Censored Expressions. Poetics (April):101423.

Ito, K. (2014). œAnti-Korean Sentiment and Hate Speech in the Current Japan: A Report from the Street. Procedia Environmental Sciences 20:434“43.

Kaakinen, M., Oksanen, A. and Räsänen, P.. (2018). œDid the Risk of Exposure to Online Hate Increase after the November 2015 Paris Attacks? A Group Relations Approach. Computers in Human Behavior 78:90“97.

Kasakowskij, T., Fürst, J., Fischer, J. and Fietkiewicz, K.J. (2020). œNetwork Enforcement as Denunciation Endorsement? A Critical Study on Legal Enforcement in Social Media. Telematics and Informatics 46(October 2019):101317.

Lee, C., and Chau, D. (2018). œLanguage as Pride, Love, and Hate: Archiving Emotions through Multilingual Instagram Hashtags. Discourse, Context and Media 22:21“29.

Miller, D. and Slater, D. (2000). The Internet : An Ethnographic Approach. Oxford: Berg.

Mossie, Z., and Wang, J.H. (2019). œVulnerable Community Identification Using Hate Speech Detection on Social Media. Information Processing and Management (November 2018):102087.

Nasrullah, R. (2017). Media Sosial : Perspektif Komunikasi Budaya Dan Sosioteknologi. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Ray, L. (2007). Globalization and Everyday Life (The New Sociology). London: Routledge.

Sairin, S. (2002). Perubahan Sosial Masyarakat Indonesia Perspektif Antropologi. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Syahputra, I. (2017). œDemokrasi Virtual Dan Perang Siber Di Media Sosial : Perspektif Netizen Indonesia. ASPIKOM 3(3):457“75.

Weber, M., Viehmann, C., Ziegele, M., and Schemer, C., (2020). œOnline Hate Does Not Stay Online “ How Implicit and Explicit Attitudes Mediate the Effect of Civil Negativity and Hate in User Comments on Prosocial Behavior. Computers in Human Behavior 104(June 2019):106192.

Downloads

Published

2020-04-30

Issue

Vol. 12 No. 1 (2020): JUPIIS (JURNAL PENDIDIKAN ILMU ILMU SOSIAL) JUNI

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2020 JUPIIS: JURNAL PENDIDIKAN ILMU-ILMU SOSIAL

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.