Pengembangan Blanded Learning dengan Model Rotasi pada Mahasiswa Calon Guru

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24114/jupiis.v11i2.13858

Keywords:

Blended Learning, Rotation Model, Research and Development

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to develop blended learning with appropriate rotation model and to test its effectiveness in Cosmography course. This research uses Research and Development method based on the steps of Borg and Gall (1989). The R & D step is done by modifying it to simplify it into three main stages: introduction, development, and testing. Data analysis consisted of three stages: validity test and reliability of research instrument, preliminary test of data in the form of data normality test with kosmogorov-smirnov and homogeneity test with lavene test, hypothesis test using independent t test sample test. This study produces learning tools (RPS, teaching materials, media, jobsheet, assessment sheets) that are eligible to use. The results of this study indicate that there is a significant difference in Cosmographic learning outcomes between groups of students studying using blended learning based on conventional and rotational models. Implementation of the rotation model in learning can increase activity, interest and improve learning outcomes because cosmographic material can be delivered more varied.

Author Biographies

Sukma Perdana Prasetya, Universitas Negeri Surabaya

Pendidikan Ilmu Pengetahuan Sosial

Nuansa Bayu Segara, Universitas Negeri Surabaya

Pendidikan Ilmu Pengetahuan Sosial

Kusnul Khotimah, Universitas Negeri Surabaya

Pendidikan Ilmu Pengetahuan Sosial

References

Aspire Public School. (2013). Handbook Blended Learning 101. (online). Retrieved 25 April, 2016, from http://aspirepublicschools.org/media/filer_public/2013/07/22/aspire-blended-learning-handbook-2013.pdf.

Borg, W. & Gall, M. (1989). Educational research an introduction. Colopon: United States of America

George, J.F. (2004). The theory of planned behavior and Internet purchasing. Internet Research. 14 (3), 198-212.

Jeffrey L.M., Milne J. & Suddaby G. (2014). Blended Learning: How Teachers Balance the Blend of Online and Classroom Components. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 13, 121-140.

Joyce, B., Weil, M., Calhoun, E. (2009). Models of teaching (8th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson Education, Inc.

Lalima, D.K.L. (2017), Blended Learning: An Innovative Approach, Universal Journal of Educational Research 5(1): 129-136

Marsh, D. (2012). Blended Learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Miarso, Y. (2004). Menyemai Benih Teknologi Pendidikan. Jakarta: Prenada Media.

Moore, K.D. (2005). Effective Intructional Strategies, from Theory to Practice. New York: Sage Publications Inc.

Poon, J. (2013). Blended Learning: An Institutional Approach for Enhancing Students' Learning Experiences. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 9 (2), 271-289.

Prasetya, S.P. (2017). Differences In Learning Outcomes Of Geography Students Using Rotation Models. Advances in Social Science. Education and Humanities Research, 79, 357- 36.

Seels, B.B., & Richey, R.C. (1994). Instructional technology: The definition and domains of the field. Washington, DC: Association for Educational Communications and Technology

Silberman, M.L. (2006). Active Learning 101 Cara Bealajar Siswa Aktif, Bandung: Nuansa.

Soekartawi, A. Haryono & F. Librero. (2002). Greater Learning Opportunities Through Distance Education: Experiences in Indonesia and the Philippines. Southeast Journal of Education.

Tuckman, W.B. (1999). Conducting Educational Research. 5nd Edition. Harcourt Brace & Company.

Downloads

Published

2019-12-01