AESTHETICS OF PLAK-PLIENG GRAVESTONE OF LAMURI KINGDOM ACEH: A STUDY ACCORDING TO SUSANNE KNAUTH LANGER'S AESTHETIC CONCEPT
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24114/jupiis.v16i1.55815Keywords:
Plak-plieng, Gravestone, Lamuri, AesteticsAbstract
The Lamuri Kingdom in Aceh has relics in the form of gravestones called "Plak-plieng" stones, which are concrete evidence and records of the history of the kings who were buried with these gravestones. This Plak-plieng gravestone is thought to be a gravestone made by local people during the reign of the Lamuri kingdom with a mixed population who emigrated from outside Aceh at that time. The Lamuri Kingdom was an Acehnese Hindu kingdom that existed in the 4th century, turned into Islam or a sultanate in the 9th century, and lasted until the 15th century. The Plak-plieng gravestone, which is characteristic of the Lamuri royal graves, was rediscovered in 1890. Based on the date written on the gravestone found, the Plak-plieng gravestone dates to the 12th century AD. Thus, the Plak-plieng gravestone was made during the Islamic era, or when Lamuri became an Islamic kingdom. The type of research in this study is research using a descriptive method. The descriptive method is a method used to look for elements, characteristics, and properties of a phenomenon. The method begins with collecting data, analysing the data, and interpreting it. This descriptive research tries to reveal and explain the problems that occur in society, especially the problem of searching for symbolic aesthetics on the Plak-plieng gravestones of the Lamuri kingdom of Aceh. The Plak-plieng gravestone contains various symbolic elements that we can find using Susane K. Langer's theory. The findings of the symbolic aesthetic meaning found are divided into several parts according to Langer's aesthetic theory. On the Plak-plieng gravestones of the Lamuri Kingdom of Aceh, symbolic aesthetics are found as a symbol of art. The implied value of this gravestone gives us an idea of the high artistic value that existed in past societies. In this way, we can see that the level of artistic taste of the people of Aceh in the past was very high. The discovery of the inscription on this gravestone also explains the glory days of a kingdom led by the owner of the gravestone. This day dates back nine hundred years. In this way, we can learn about the value of art in the past through the Acehnese civilisation and how they found materials for making sturdy gravestones and a variety of ornaments that were very complicated and beautiful.References
Ambary, Hasan Muarif. (1984). L™art Funeraire Musulman En Indonesie Des Origines Au XIXe Siecle Etude Epigraphique et Typologique. Ecole des Hautes Etudes en Sciences Sociales, Paris.
Ambary, Hasan Muarif, and Sakai Takashi. (1993). Banten Pelabuhan Keramik Jepang, Situs Kota Pelabuhan Islam di Indonesia. Jakarta: Pusat Penelitian Arkeologi Nasional Jakarta.
Arikunto, Suharsimi. (2011). Metodologi Penelitian . Jakarta: PT. Rineka Cipta.
Azis, Halina Budi Santosa. 1976. Beberapa Bentuk Nisan Kubur di Daerah Banten Lama Sebuah Tinjauan Deskriptif. Universitas Indonesia.
Damais, Louis-Charles. (1995). Epigrafi Islam di Asia Tenggara. Epigrafi dan Sejarah Nusantara. Jakarta: Pusat Penelitian Arkeologi Nasional kerjasama dengan Ecole Francaise d™Extreme Orient.
Gupte, R.S. (1972). Iconography of The Hindus, Buddhist, and Jains. Bombay: D.B. Taraporevala Sons & Co. Private Ltd.
Hartanti, Grace, and Amarena Nediari. (2014). Pendokumentasian Aplikasi Ragam Hias Budaya Bali sebagai Upaya Konservasi Budaya Bangsa Khususnya. Humaniora Vol.5 No.1: 521“40.
Hoop, A.N.J. Th. ath. Van Der. (1949). Indonesische Siermotieven. Batavia: Koninklijk Bataviaasch Genootschap Van Kunsten en Wetenschappen.
Inagurasi, Libra Hari. (2009). Karakteristik Kompleks Pemakaman Kuna Selaparang. Kalpataru Majalah Arkeologi Vol. 19 No 1: 71“80.
Iskandar, Norman. (2007). Jejak Raja-raja Aceh. Sumatera Utara: Tiga Serangkai
Keat, Gin Ooi. (2004). Lamuri East Indonesia. Southeast Asia: Angkor Wat.
Kendall, George David. (2010). Stokastik dan Parameter Objek. Amerika Serikat: Royal Society.
Langer,Susanne Knauth, (1957). Problems Of Art:Ten Philosophical Lecture Edition 6, Charles Scribner Sons, New York
Leight, Barbara. (1989). Tangan-tangan Trampil Seni Kerajinan Aceh. Jakarta: Djambatan.
Montana. (2006-2007). Perjalanan Islam di Tanah Melayu. Jakarta: Erlangga.
Ricklefs, M.C. (2008). A History of Modern Indonesia Since C 1200 M. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Rosmawati. (2011). Tipe Nisan Aceh dan Demak Troloyo pada Kompleks Makam Sultan Hasanuddin, Tallo dan Katangka. Wallenae Vol.13 No.2: 209- 220.
Said, Muhammad.(2012). Aceh Sepanjang Abad. Sumatera Utara: Tiga Serangkai
Shadilly, hasan dan Bastomi. (2003). Leksikograf Indonesia. Jogjakarta: Publishing Project.
Soedarsono. (1992). Pengantar Apresiasi Seni. Jakarta: Balai Pustaka.
Sugiono. (2010). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Sugiono. 2013. Metodologi Penelitian Kombinasi. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Sumardjo, Jacob. (2000). Filsafat seni, ITB, Bandung
Suryadi. (2015). Majalah Wali Nanggroe edisi ke-7. Banda Aceh: Acehkita.
Suwandi. (2005). Berkarya Seni Untuk SMP. Jakarta: Ganeca Exact.
Tedy, Maskapache. (2011). Sejarah Peninggalan Kerajaan di Indonesia. Jakarta: Erlangga.
Tim Penyusun Kamus Pusat Bahasa. (2005). Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia. Jakarta: Balai Pustaka.
Van Peursen, C.A., (1993). Strategi Kebudayaan, Cet ke-4, Kanisius, Yogyakarta
Wibisono, I. Wibowo. (1997). Simbol Menurut Suanne K. Langer: Dalam Seri Driyakara 4 dari sudut-sudut filsafat, Kanisius, Yogyakarta.
Yatim, Othman Mohd. (1988). Batu Aceh Early, Islamic Gravestones in Peninsular Malaysia. Kuala Lumpur: Museum Association of Malaysia.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 JUPIIS: JURNAL PENDIDIKAN ILMU-ILMU SOSIAL
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.