Sensitivity of two-tier and three-tier tests in detecting student™s misconceptions of chemical bonding
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24114/jpkim.v12i2.19405Abstract
This research study aims to determine how the sensitivity of two-tier and three-tier tests in detecting student™s misconceptions about chemical bonding. This research is a quantitative study with a total sampling technique that is measured using three-tier multiple-choice with a modified CRI. Based on the findings, with a two-tier multiple-choice, the percentage value of the understanding category is 86.06%, misconceptions are 6.89%, and do not understand is 7.06%. Meanwhile, using a three-tier multiple-choice, the percentage value of the understanding category is 85.33%, misconception amounted to 7.61%, and did not understand 7.06%. This study concludes that three-tier multiple-choice is more sensitive than two-tier multiple-choice in detecting students' misconceptions of chemical bonding. Keywords: Chemical bonding, Misconception, Three-tier, Two-tierReferences
Anintia, R., Sadhu, S. & Annisa, D. (2017). Identify students™ concept understanding using three - tier multiple choice questions ( TTMCs ) on stoichiometry. International Journal of Science and Applied Science: Conference Series, 2(1), 308“317. doi: 10.20961/ijsascs.v2i1.16734.
Caleon, I. & Subramaniam, R. (2010). Development and application of a three-tier diagnostic test to assess secondary students™ understanding of waves. International Journal of Science Education, 32(7), 939 “ 961. doi: 10.1080/09500690902890130.
Dindar, A. C. & Geban, O. (2011). Development of a three-tier test to assess hight school students™ understanding of acid and bases. Procedia sosial and behavioral sciences, 15, 600“604. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.03.147.
Halim, L., Yong, T. K., & Meerah, T. S. M (2014). Overcoming students™ misconceptions on forces in equilibrium: An action research study. Scientific Research An Academic Publisher, 5(11), 1032“1042. doi: 10.4236/ce.2014.511117.
Hasan, S., Bagayoko, D., & Kelley, E. L. (1999). Misconceptions and the Certainty of Response Index (CRI). Physics Education, 34(5), 294“299. doi: 10.1088/0031-9120/34/5/304
Kamilah, D. Si. & Suwarna, I. P. (2016). Pengembangan three-tier test digital untuk mengidentifikasi miskonsepsi pada konsep fluida statis. Edusains, 8(2), 212“220. doi: 10.15408/es.v8i2.5192.
Kirbulut, Z. D. & Geban, O. (2014). Using three-tier diagnostic test to asse ss students ™ misconceptions of states of matter. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 10(5), 509“521. doi: 10.12973/eurasia.2014.1128a.
Meltafina, M., Wiji, W. & Mulyani, S. (2019). Misconceptions and threshold concepts in chemical bonding. In International Conference on Mathematics and Science Education (ICMScE 2018). doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1157/4/042030.
Mustaqim, T. A., Zulfiani & Herlanti, Y. (2015). Identifikasi miskonsepsi siswa dengan menggunakan metode certainty of response index (CRI) pada konsep fotosintesis dan respirasi tumbuhan. Edusains, 6(2), 145“ 152. doi: 10.15408/es.v6i2.1117.
Prodjosantoso, A. K., Hertina, A. M. & Irwanto (2019). The misconception diagnosis on ionic and covalent bonds concepts with three tier diagnostic test. International Journal of Instruction, 12(1), 1477“1488. doi: 10.29333/iji.2019.12194a.
Sadhu, S., Tima, M. T., Cahyani, V. P., Laka, A. F., Annisa, D., & Fahriyah, A. R. (2017). Analysis of acid-base misconceptions using modified certainty of response index (CRI) and diagnostic interview for different student levels cognitive. International Journal of Science and Applied Science: Conference Series, 1(2), 91“100. doi: 10.20961/ijsascs.v1i2.5126.
Safitri, N. C., Nursaadah, E.& Wijayanti, I. E. (2019). Analisis multipel representasi kimia siswa pada konsep laju reaksi. EduChemia (Jurnal Kimia dan Pendidikan), 4(1), 1-12. doi: 10.30870/educhemia.v4i1.5023.
Sen, S., Varoglu, L. & Yilmaz, A. (2019). Cognitive structures and misconceptions with thematic framework: The case of chemical bonding. Journal of Eucation and future, (16), 65“78. doi: 10.30786/jef.466415.
Silaban, S. (2017). Dasar-dasar pendidikan matematika dan ilmu pengetahuan alam. Medan: Harapan Cerdas Publisher.
Soeharto, S., Csapó, B., Sarimanah, E., Dewi, F. I., & Sabri, T. (2019). A review of students™ common misconceptions in science and their diagnostic assessment tools. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 8(2), 247“266. doi: 10.15294/jpii.v8i2.18649.
Stojanovska, M., Petruševski, V. M., & Šoptrajanov, B. (2014). Study of the use of the three levels of thinking and representation. Contributions, Section of Natural, Mathematical and Biotechnical Sciences, 35(1), 37-46. doi: 10.20903/csnmbs.masa.2014.35.1.52
Suryani, Y. E. (2017). Pemetaan kualitas empirik soal ujian akhir semester pada mata pelajaran bahasa Indonesia SMA di kabupaten Klaten. Jurnal Penelitian dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 21(2), 142“152. doi: 10.21831/pep.v21i2.10725.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 Ebiati Ebiati, Asrial Asrial, Muhammad Haris Effendi-Hasibuan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors published in this journal agree to the following terms:
- The copyright of each article is retained by the author (s).
- The author grants the journal the first publication rights with the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, allowing others to share the work with an acknowledgment of authorship and the initial publication in this journal.
- Authors may enter into separate additional contractual agreements for the non-exclusive distribution of published journal versions of the work (for example, posting them to institutional repositories or publishing them in a book), with acknowledgment of their initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (For example in the Institutional Repository or on their website) before and during the submission process, as this can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and larger citations of published work.
Jurnal Pendidikan Kimia is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
.png)
