Mapping learning difficulties in general chemistry course

Authors

  • Asyti Febliza Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Universitas Islam Riau, Pekanbaru-Indonesia
  • Putri Ade Rahma Yulis Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Universitas Islam Riau, Pekanbaru-Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24114/jpkim.v10i2.10772

Abstract

Abstract:       Many first semester students in University struggle to study chemistry, it proven by low achievement of students in learning general chemistry. This study investigated student™s difficulties to understand in term of chemistry material characteristics (fundamental concept, advanced concept, mathematical concept and misconception) and learning process in the class. This investigation includes a coginitve test and a difficulty questionnaire were given to 92 first semester students in Biology program Universitas Islam Riau-Indonesia who took general chemistry course. Research questions in this study were: 1) What topics did students find difficult?; 2) Which chemistry material indicators did students feel difficult?; 3) How did student™s perceptions about learning chemistry before and after learning process in college?. The result gave information that student™s difficulties mostly existed in average level in chemical bonding about 84 students, stoichiometry around 52 students and higher level of barrier in colligative properties topics reached 52 students. Furthermore, students felt higher difficult in three indicators in term of mathematical concept, advanced concept and misconception with number reached 46%, 65% and 61% respectively. Difficulty questionnaire showed the slightly dropping around 9% before and after learning process. Overall, the difficulties encountered in average level and higher level. Topic that sudents felt difficult were: chemical bonding, stoichiometry and colligative properties, which each topic contained higher skill such as advanced concept, mathematical skill and misconception. The minor dip in student™s perception can give us information about quality changes after learning process.Keywords:basic chemistry; learning difficulties indicator; student™s difficulties; students™s perception

Author Biographies

Asyti Febliza, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Universitas Islam Riau, Pekanbaru-Indonesia

Chemistry Education

Putri Ade Rahma Yulis, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Universitas Islam Riau, Pekanbaru-Indonesia

Chemistry Education

References

Akani. (2017). Identification of the Areas of Students Difficulties in Chemistry Curriculum at the Secondary School Level. Inter J Emerging Trends Sci and Technol 4(4), 5071-5077.

Arikunto, S.(2013). Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktik. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Cardellini, L. (2012). Chemistry: why the subject is difficult?. Edu Quimica, 23, 305-310.

Childsa, P. & Sheehan, M. (2009). What™s difficult about chemistry? An irish perspective. chemistry education. Resh and Practice, 3(10), 204“218.

Febliza, A. (2018). Pengaruh penerapan multimedia interaktif dengan pembelajaran inkuiri pada topik kesetimbangan dalam larutan terhadap hasil belajar mahasiswa kimia. Perspektif Pendidikan dan Keguruan 9(1), 1-6.

Febliza, A. & Afdal, Z. (2015). Statistika dasar penelitian Pendidikan. Adefa grafika, Pekanbaru.

Manalu, E., Silaban, S., Silaban, R., & Hutabarat, W. (2016). The development of chemical practice guidebook colloid system-based integrated contextual character values. Jurnal Pendidikan Kimia, 8(2), 8-13.

Manalu, H. C., Hutabarat, W. & Silaban, S. (2017). The Development of Cooperative Learning Model Type Teams Games Tournament (TGT) Integrated on Scientific Approach. ICIESC, 6-11.

Saritas., M.T. (2015). Chemistry teacher candidates™ acceptance and opinions about virtual reality technology for molecular geometry. Academic J Edu Res and Rev, 10(20), 2745-2757.

Scot., F.J. (2016). An investigation into students™ difficulties in numerical problem solving questions in high school biology using a numeracy framework. European J Sci and Math Edu, 4(2), 115-128.

Silaban, S. & Simangunsong, N.S.D. (2015). Pengaruh model pembelajaran Contextual Teaching and Learning (CTL) terhadap hasil belajar siswa pada pokok bahasan sistem koloid. Jurnal Pendidikan Kimia, 7(01), 95-101.

Sokrat, H., Tamani, S., Moutaabbid, M. & Radid, M. (2014). Difficulties of students from the faculty of science with regard to understanding the concepts of chemical thermodynamics. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 368-372.

Woldeamanuel, M. M., Atagana, H. & Engida, T. (2014). What makes chemistry difficult?. African J Chem Edu, 4(2), 31-43.

Downloads

Published

2018-08-31

Issue

Section

Articles