THE IMPLEMENTATION OF SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY, ENGINEERING, AND MATHEMATICS (STEM) APPROACH FOR IMPROVING MULTIPLE-REPRESENTATION SKILL OF SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL STUDENT ON NEWTON'S LAW ABOUT MOTION
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22611/jpf.v7i2.9644Keywords:
STEM approach, multiple-representation skill, Newton’s Law about motionAbstract
This study aimed to investigate the improvement of multiple-representation skill of tenth grader students at Senior High School on Newton™s Law about motion by using STEM approach. The population of this study is all students of class X in senior high school in Lampung Province. The sample of this study was taken by purposive sampling that is as much as two classes which amounted to 62 students. The design used in this research is the non-equivalent pretest-posttest control group design. Experimental class used STEM Approach and control class used scientific approach (observing, questioning, experimenting, associating, and communicating). Multiple-representation skills data retrieval using a description test with a total of ten questions. Enhancement analysis using calculation of Normalized Gain (N-Gain). Based on the result of this research, it was known that control class had N-gain average score in the amount of 0,55, while the experiment class had N-gain average score in the amount of 0,63. Based on T Test result analysis showed that there was difference of N-gain average score of students™ multiple-representation skill between experimental class and control class. Students who learned with the STEM approach have significantly better of multiple-representation skill than those who learned with the scientific approachReferences
Abdurrahman., Liliasari., A. Rusli., & B. Waldrip. 2011. Implementasi Pembelajaran Berbasis Multi Representasi untuk Peningkatan Penguasaan Konsep Fisika Kuantum. Cakrawala Pendidikan. 1 (1): 30-45.
Ainsworth, S. 1999. The Functions of Multiple Representations. Computers & Education. 33 (2): 131-152.
Blackley, S., Rahmawati, Y., Fitriani, E., Sheffield, R., & Koul, R. 2018. Using a Makerspace Approach to Engage Indonesian Primary Students with STEM. Issues in Educational Research. 28(1): 18-42.
Cantrell, P., Pekcan, G., Itani, A., & VelasquezBryant, N. 2006. The Effects of Engineering Modules on Student Learning in Middle School Science Classrooms. Journal of Engineering Education. 95(4): 301-309.
Kaniawati, D. S., & Suwarma, I. K. I. R. 2015. Study Literasi Pengaruh Pengintegrasian Pendekatan STEM dalam Learning Cycle 5E terhadap Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Siswa pada Pembelajaran Fisika. Departemen Pendidikan Fisika FPMIPA UPI. 39.
Pangesti, K. I., Yulianti, D., & Sugianto, S. 2017. Bahan Ajar Berbasis STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics) untuk Meningkatkan Penguasaan Konsep Siswa SMA. UPEJ Unnes Physics Education Journal. 6(3). 53-58.
Priyatno. 2010. Paham Analisa Statistik Data dengan SPSS. Jakarta: Buku Seri.
Rehmat, A. P. 2015. Engineering the Path to Higher-Order Thinking in Elementary Education: A Problem-Based Learning Approach for STEM Integration. UNLV Theses/Dissertations/ProfessionalPapers /Capstones. Paper 2497.
Waldrip, B., Prain, V. & Carolan, J. 2006. Learning Junior Secondary Science through Multi-Modal Representations. Electronic Journal of Science Education. 11 (1): 86-105.
Yusup, M. 2009. Multirepresentasi dalam Pembelajaran Fisika. Jurnal Pendidikan Teknologi Informasi dan Komunikasi. 2 (1).
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2018 Karlina Maya Mulyana, Abdurrahman Abdurrahman, Undang Rosidin
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika allow the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions and allow the author(s) to retain publishing rights without restrictions. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika CC-BY or an equivalent license as the optimal license for the publication, distribution, use, and reuse of scholarly work.
In developing strategy and setting priorities, Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika recognize that free access is better than priced access, libre access is better than free access, and libre under CC-BY or the equivalent is better than libre under more restrictive open licenses. We should achieve what we can when we can. We should not delay achieving free in order to achieve libre, and we should not stop with free when we can achieve libre.
Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.