THE EFFECT OF COOPERATIVE LEARNING MODEL GROUP INVESTIGATION AGAINST STUDENT LEARNING OUTCOMES PHYSICS VIEWED FROM THE ADVERSITY QUOTIENT
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22611/jpf.v6i1.6344Keywords:
Cooperative GI type Model, Physics Student Learning Outcomes, Adversity QuotientAbstract
This study aims to determine: learning outcomes physics students with cooperative learning model GI and conventional learning, learning outcomes physics students who have Adversity Quotient (AQ) high and medium AQ and interaction cooperative learning model GI and AQ in affecting learning physics students. This quasi-experimental study using pretest-posttest control group design. The sample in this research is class X IPA.4 as an experimental class and class X IPA.3 as the control class is selected by simple random sampling. The instrument used is the achievement test and which AQ questionnaire form. Data was analyzed using two ways ANOVA. The results shows that: learning outcomes physics students with cooperative learning model GI better than conventional learning, learning outcomes physics students who have a high AQ better than students who have a medium AQ and there is interaction between cooperative learning model GI and AQ in influencing physics student learning outcomes.References
Aristi, A, F. 2014. Efek Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif tipe Group Investigation dan Motivasi terhadap Hasil Belajar Fisika Siswa MAN Tanjung Balai. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika, 3(2): 1-7.
Budiada, I W. 2011. Pengaruh Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Inkuiri Terbimbing Berbasis Asesmen Portofolio Terhadap Hasil Belajar Kimia Siswa Kelas X Ditinjau dari Adversity Quotient. Jurnal Pendidikan, 1-16.
Irwan,N, Sani,R,A. 2015. Efek Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif tipe Group Investigation dan Team Work Skills Terhadap Hasil Belajar Fisika Siswa. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika, 4(1): 41-48.
Joyce,B ,Weil,M, Calhoun,E. 2009. Models Of Teaching. Yogyakarta: Percetakan Pustaka Belajar.
Mitchell, M, G., Monthgomery H., Holder M. 2008. Group Investigation as a Cooperative Learning Strategy: An Integrated Analysis of the Literature. Jurnal. The Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 54(4).
Musyaddad, K. 2013. Problematika Pendidikan Indonesia. Edu-Bio, 4: 51-57.
Mutiara. 2014. Efek Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif tipe Group Investigation (GI) dan Penguasaan Materi Fisika Prasyarat terhadap Hasil Belajar Fisika Siswa SMA. Jurnal Pendidika Fisika, 3(2): 46-52.
Pratama, R, R. 2016. Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Berbasis Masalah dan Advesity Quotient Siswa terhadap Hasil Belajar pada Materi Pokok Listrik Dinamis di Kelas X Semester II SMA Negeri 4 Binjai T.P. 2015/2016. Skripsi tidak diterbitkan. Medan: FMIPA UNIMED.
Purwadi, Suwandi, S., Slamet. 2013. The Effect of the Contextual, the Problem-Based, and the Group Investigation Learning Models on the Short Story Appreciation Ability Viewed from the Verbal Linguistic Intelligences. Jurnal Education and Practice, 4(12).
Stoltz, P, C. 2000. Adversity Quotient Mengubah Hambatan Menjadi Peluang. Jakarta: Gramedia.
Tambunan, E dan Bukit, N. 2015. Analisis Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif tipe Group Investigation dan Pemahaman Konsep Awal terhadap Hasil Belajar Siswa di SMA Negeri 1 Teluk Mengkudu. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika, 4(1): 49-56.
Wismayana, Ngurah P. 2007. Pengaruh Model Belajar Berbasis Masalah danAdversity Quotient Siswa Terhadap Prestasi Belajar Matematika dan Konsep Diri Siswa Sma Negeri 4 Singaraja. Abstrak Penelitian dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 2(-): 21-22.
Zakir, S. 2007. Usaha Guru Dalam Mengatasi Anak Yang Bermasalah Dalam Belajar, (Online), (http://manzaku.blogspot.com/2007/09/mengatasi-masalah-belajar.html, diakses tanggal 30 Oktober 2016).
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2017 Rajo Hasim Lubis
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika allow the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions and allow the author(s) to retain publishing rights without restrictions. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika CC-BY or an equivalent license as the optimal license for the publication, distribution, use, and reuse of scholarly work.
In developing strategy and setting priorities, Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika recognize that free access is better than priced access, libre access is better than free access, and libre under CC-BY or the equivalent is better than libre under more restrictive open licenses. We should achieve what we can when we can. We should not delay achieving free in order to achieve libre, and we should not stop with free when we can achieve libre.
Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
