THE EFFECT OF MODEL SCIENTIFIC INQUIRY TOWARD SCIENCE PROCESS SKILLS VIEWED FROM SCIENTIFIC ARGUMENTATION
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22611/jpf.v6i1.6340Keywords:
scientific inquiry learning model, scientific argumentation, science process skillsAbstract
The purpose of this research is to determine: the result of students™ science process skill with using scientific inquiry learning model better than conventional learning, science process skill of students who have high average scientific argumentation better than students who have low average scientific argumentation, the interaction between scientific inquiry learning model and scientific argumentation of physics students' science process skill. This research is a quasi-experimental research. The sampling choosed by cluster random sampling. This research instrument used tests of scientific argumentation and science process skills test. The results of this research concluded that: the science process skill of students using scientific inquiry learning model better than conventional learning, science process skill of students who have high average scientific argumentation better than students who have the low average scientific argumentation, and there was interaction between the scientific inquiry learning model and conventional learning with scientific argumentation to improve physics students' science process skill.References
Akinbobola, A.O dan Afolabi, F. (2010). Analysis of Science process skills in west African senior secondary school certificate physics practical examination in Nigeria. American-Eruasian journal of scientific research, 5, (4), 234-240 (http://bjsep.org diakses pada 12 September 2016)
Dhaaka, A. (2012). Biological Science Inquiry Model and Biology Teaching. Bookman International Journal of Accounts, Economics & Business Management, Vol. 1 No. 2, October-November-December 2012 (http://bookmanjournals.com diakses pada 12 September 2016)
Harlen,W. & Elsgeest, J. (1992). UNESCO Sourcebook for Science in the Primary School. France. Imprimerie de la Manutention.
Hinduan, A., Setiawan, W., Siahaan, P., dan Suyan, I. (2007). Ilmu dan Aplikasi Pendidikan Fisika. Handbook Tim Pengembang Ilmu Pendidikan UPI. Bandung: PT Imperial Bhakti Utama
Joyce, B. Weil, M. dan Calhoun, E. (2009). Models of Teaching. Terjemahan oleh Fawaid, A. dan Miza, A. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Muslim, K dan Tapilouw, F.S. (2015). Pengaruh Model Inkuiri Ilmiah Terhadap Peningkatan Keterampilan Proses Sains Siswa Pada Materi Kalor. Jurnal EDUSAINS, VII (1), 2015, 88-96 (http://journal.uinjkt.ac.id diakses pada pada 03 September 2016 )
Putri, M.K. (2017). Efek Model Scientific Inquiry dan Agumentasi Ilmiah Terhadap Keterampilan Proses Sains Siswa SMA. Tesis tidak diterbitkan. Medan: Program Pascasarjana Unimed.
Sugiyono. (2011). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif. Bandung: Alfabeta
Toulmin, S. (2003). The Uses of Argument. New York : Cambridge University Press
Trianto. (2011). Model Pembelajaran Terpadu. Jakarta : PT. Bumi Aksara
Türkoguz, S., dan Cin, M. (2014). Effects of Argumentation Based Concept Cartoon Activities on Students' Scientific Process Skills. Mersin University Journal of the Faculty of Education, Vol. 10, Issue 2, August 2014, pp. 142-156 (http://dergipark.ulakbim.gov.tr diakses 14 Agustus 2016)
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2017 Meutia Kemala Putri
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika allow the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions and allow the author(s) to retain publishing rights without restrictions. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika CC-BY or an equivalent license as the optimal license for the publication, distribution, use, and reuse of scholarly work.
In developing strategy and setting priorities, Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika recognize that free access is better than priced access, libre access is better than free access, and libre under CC-BY or the equivalent is better than libre under more restrictive open licenses. We should achieve what we can when we can. We should not delay achieving free in order to achieve libre, and we should not stop with free when we can achieve libre.
Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.