THE INQUIRY TRAINING LEARNING MODEL USE MIND MAPPING AND FORMAL THINKING ABILITY ON STUDENT™S SCIENCE PROCESS SKILLS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22611/jpf.v6i1.6337Keywords:
inquiry training, mind mapping, formal thinking ability, science process skillsAbstract
The aim of this research were to analyzes: the different students™s science process skills by using inquiry training learning model and using conventional learning, the different students™s science process skills in the group of students who had formal thinking ability above average and below average, and the interaction inquiry training learning model and conventional learning with formal thinking ability of the students™s science process skills. This research carried out by a quasi-experimental with using two group pretest-postest design. The population of this study was class IX SMP IT An-Nizam Medan. The sample in this research was conducted by cluster random sampling of two classes, experiment class by using inquiry training learning model and control class by using conventional learning. The instruments of this study used science process skills in the perform work form and formal thinking ability test were collected by essay test. The data was analyzed by using two-way analysis of varians. The results of this research are the different students™s science process skills of inquiry training learning model and conventional learning, the different students™s science process skills who had formal thinking ability above average and below average, and there were an interactions between the inquiry training learning model with formal thinking ability in improving students's science process skills.References
Aziz, Benni. 2012. Pengaruh Metode Pembelajaran Peta Pikiran Terhadap Hasil Belajar Fisika Siswa Pada Materi Pokok Getaran Dan Gelombang Di Kelas VIII SMP Neeri 12 Binjai. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika 1 (1), 51-56.
Buzan, T. 2008. Mind Map untuk Meningkatkan Kreativitas. Jakarta: Gramedia.
Derlina, S. Mihardi. 2015. Implementasi Model Pembelajaran Inquiry Training Dalam Pembelajaran Fisika Untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Berpikir Formal Siswa. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Indonesia 11 (2), 162-169.
Dimyati & Mudjiono. 2009. Belajar dan Pembelajaran. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta
Erlina. (2011). Deskripsi Kemampuan Berpikir Formal Mahasiswa Pendidikan Kimia Universitas Tanjung Pura. Jurnal Visi Ilmu Pendidikan 6 (3), 631-640.
Erman & Edy Minarto. 2011. Memacu Kemampuan Berpikir Formal Siswa Melalui Pembelajaran IPA Sejak Dini. Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar Universitas Negeri Surabaya 5 (2), 89-97.
Hidayat, M, Iman.2015. Efek Model Pembelajaran Inquiry Training Berbasis Multimedia Lectora Dan Kemampuan Berpikir Formal Terhadap Hasil Belajar Fisika Siswa. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika 4 (1), 25-32
Joyce, B, Weil, M & Calhoun, E. 2009. Models of Teaching, Edisi Delapan. Pustaka Belajar, Yogyakarta.
Lina, Arifa Fitriya. 2013. The Relations Of Formal Thinking Ability And Inquiry Approac In Science Learning
M. Syawaidi. 2015. Kemampuan Berpikir Formal Mahasiswa. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika 8 (2), 137-153.
Pandey, A., Nanda, K,G., & Ranjan, V. 2011. Effectiveness of Inquiry Training Model Over Conventional Teaching Method on Academic Achievement of Science Students in India. Journal of Innovative Research in Education. 1(1): 7-20
Rustaman, N, Y. 2003. Strategi Belajara Mengajar Biologi. Commo Textbook JIKA IMSTEP. Bandung: FPMTPA UPI
Valanides, Nicolas. 1997. Formal Reasoning Abalities And School Achievemnat. Studies in Educational Evalutioan 23 (2), 169-185.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2017 Bima Anggraini
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika allow the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions and allow the author(s) to retain publishing rights without restrictions. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika CC-BY or an equivalent license as the optimal license for the publication, distribution, use, and reuse of scholarly work.
In developing strategy and setting priorities, Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika recognize that free access is better than priced access, libre access is better than free access, and libre under CC-BY or the equivalent is better than libre under more restrictive open licenses. We should achieve what we can when we can. We should not delay achieving free in order to achieve libre, and we should not stop with free when we can achieve libre.
Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.