EFFECTS OF COOPERATIVE LEARNING MODEL TYPE STAD JUST-IN TIME BASED ON THE RESULTS OF LEARNING TEACHING PHYSICS COURSE IN PHYSICS SCHOOL IN PHYSICS PROGRAM FACULTY UNIMED

Authors

  • Teguh Febri Sudarma
  • Motlan .

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22611/jpf.v2i1.4332

Keywords:

just in time teaching, STAD, hasil belajar siswa

Abstract

Research was aimed to determine: (1) Students™ learning outcomes that was taught with just in time teaching based STAD cooperative learning method and STAD cooperative learning method (2) Students™ outcomes on Physics subject that had high learning activity compared with low learning activity. The research sample was random by raffling four classes to get two classes. The first class taught with just in time teaching based STAD cooperative learning method, while the second class was taught with STAD cooperative learning method. The instrument used was conceptual understanding that had been validated with 7 essay questions. The average gain values of students learning results with just in time teaching based STAD cooperative learning method 0,47 higher than average gain values of students learning results with STAD cooperative learning method. The high learning activity and low learning activity gave different learning results. In this case the average gain values of students learning results with just in time teaching based STAD cooperative learning method 0,48 higher than average gain values of students learning results with STAD cooperative learning method. There was interaction between learning model and learning activity to the physics learning result test in students

References

Ade Soji, A., Ibraheem, L. 2009. Effects Of Student Teams-Achievement Divisions Strategy And Mathematics Knowlegde On Learning Outcomes In Chemical Kinetics. The Journal Of International Social Research Volume 2/6 Winter.

Ahmad, Z., Mahmood, N. 2010. Effects of Cooperative Learning vs. Traditional Instruction on Prospective Teachers™ Learning Experience and Achievement. Journal of Faculty of Educational Sciences. Pakistan: Ankara University. Arends, R. I. 2009. Learning to Teach (7th ed.). Belajar untuk Mengajar (Terjemahan Helly Prajitno Soetjipto dan Sri Mulyantini Soetjipto pada Tahun 2008). Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar. Djamarah, S.B. 2006. Strategi Belajar Mengajar. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta. Hake, R. R. 1990. Analyzing Change/Gain Scores. http://Lists.Asu.Edu/Egi-Bin/Wa? A2=Ind9903&L=Aera_D&P=R6855,Am erican Educational Research Associations Division, Measurement And Research Methodology. p. 1. Novak, G. 1993. http://jittdl.physics.iupui.edu/ jitt/what.html. (diakses pada tanggal 2 Februari 2010) Novak, G. 1999. http://serc.carleton.edu/intro geo/justintime/index.html. (diakses pada tangal 2 Februari 2010) Novak, G. Gavrini, A. Cristian, W. 1999. Justin-Time Teaching: Blending Active Learning with Web Technology. http:// serc. carleton. Edu /resources /395.html (diakses pada tanggal 2 Februari 2010) Santoso, S. 2008. Panduan Lengkap Menguasai SPSS 16. Jakarta: PT Elex Media Komputindo. Subagiyo, L. 2007. Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Dalam Peningkatan Motivasi, Partisipasi, Dan Kualitas Hasil Belajar Siswa Sma Negeri 2 Samarinda. Didantika Vol 8. Bandung: Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia. Sudjana, N. 2005. Metode Statistika. Bandung: Tarsito.

Downloads

Published

2013-06-01

Issue

Section

Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Volume 2// No.1// Juni 2013