THE LEVEL UNDERSTANDING OF THERMODYNAMIC CONCEPT FOR PHYSICS AND CHEMISTRY UNDERGRADUATE STUDENTS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24114/jpf.v12i1.42330Keywords:
The Level Understanding, Thermodynamic, Physics and ChemistryAbstract
Thermodynamics is an abstract concept making it difficult for physics and chemistry undergraduate student to understand it. The purpose of this research is to know the level understanding of the fundamental concepts of thermodynamics so that lecturers can develop strategies to teach thermodynamics appropriately. An exploratory small-scale study was conducted on students majoring in physics and chemistry to evaluate an understanding of heat, temperature, energy, work, thermodynamic processes and the first law of thermodynamics. The research sample consisted of 20 undergraduate students who were randomly selected from two majors, namely physics and chemistry. Data were collected through a diagnostic test to determine the level understanding of students' concepts which consisted of 20 questions. In addition, interviews were conducted with those of 20 students related to given questions. The results showed that the level of students' conceptual understanding of the concept of thermodynamics was still low. The main reasons that cause students have problems in understanding thermodynamic concepts are the concept of thermodynamics is an abstract physics concept and the matters of thermodynamics are lack in explanation and interpretation of phenomena and not linking them to daily lifeReferences
Anderson, E. E., Taraban, R., & Sharma, M. P. (2005). Implementing and assessing computer-based active learning materials in introductory thermodynamics. International Journal of Engineering Education, 21(6), 1168.
Carmichael, P., Driver, R., Holding, B., Phillips, I., Twigger, D., & Watts, M. (1990). Research on Students™ Conceptions in Science”A Bibliography. Leeds: University of Leeds.
Carson, E. M., & Watson, J. R. (2002). Undergraduate students™ understandings of entropy and Gibbs free energy. University Chemistry Education, 6(1), 4-12.
Chi, M. T., Slotta, J. D., & De Leeuw, N. (1994). From things to processes: A theory of conceptual change for learning science concepts. Learning and instruction, 4(1), 27-43.
Chiu, M. H. (2007). A national survey of students™ conceptions of chemistry in Taiwan. International Journal of Science Education, 29(4), 421-452. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09500690601072964.
Cox, A. J., Belloni, M., Dancy, M., & Christian, W. (2003). Teaching thermodynamics with Physlets® in introductory physics. Physics Education, 38(5), 433. http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0031-9120/38/5/309.
Darmofal, D. L., Soderholm, D. H., & Brodeur, D. R. (2002, November). Using concept maps and concept questions to enhance conceptual understanding. In 32nd Annual Frontiers in Education (Vol. 1, pp. T3A-T3A). IEEE. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/fie.2002.1157954.
Dixon, J. R., & EMERY, A. H. (1965). Semantics, operationalism, and the molecular-statistical model in thermodynamics. American Scientist, 53(4), 428-436.
Jasien, P. G., & Oberem, G. E. (2002). Understanding of elementary concepts in heat and temperature among college students and K-12 teachers. Journal of Chemical Education, 79(7), 889. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ed079p889.
Junglas, P. (2006). Simulation programs for teaching thermodynamics. Global J. of Engng. Educ, 10(2), 175-180.
Krummel, R., Sunal, D. W., & Sunal, C. S. (2007). Helping students reconstruct conceptions of thermodynamics: energy and heat. Science Activities, 44(3), 106-112. http://dx.doi.org/10.3200/sats.44.3.106-112.
McDermott, L. (2003). Improving student learning in sciences. Physical Science News, 4(2), 6-10
Mulop, N., Yusof, K. M., & Tasir, Z. (2012). A review on enhancing the teaching and learning of thermodynamics. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 56, 703-712.
Niaz, M. (2006). Can the study of thermochemistry facilitate students™ differentiation between heat energy and temperature?. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 15(3), 269-276. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10956-006-9013-7.
Osborne, R., & Wittrock, M. (1985). The generative learning model and its implications for science education.
Pfundt, H., & Duit, R. (1994). Students' alternative frameworks and science education. Institute for Science Education, 4(1).
Sokrat, H., Tamani, S., Moutaabbid, M., & Radid, M. (2014). Difficulties of students from the faculty of science with regard to understanding the concepts of chemical thermodynamics. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 368-372. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.223.
Sozbilir, M. (2001). A study of undergraduates' understandings of key chemical ideas in thermodynamics (Doctoral dissertation, University of York).
Yeo, S., & Zadnik, M. (2001). Introductory thermal concept evaluation: Assessing students' understanding. The Physics Teacher, 39(8), 496-504.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Dewi Wulandari, Destria Roza, Destria Roza, M Aswin Rangkuti, M Aswin Rangkuti, Yul Ifda Tanjung, Yul Ifda Tanjung, Irham Ramadhani, Irham Ramadhani
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika allow the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions and allow the author(s) to retain publishing rights without restrictions. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika CC-BY or an equivalent license as the optimal license for the publication, distribution, use, and reuse of scholarly work.
In developing strategy and setting priorities, Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika recognize that free access is better than priced access, libre access is better than free access, and libre under CC-BY or the equivalent is better than libre under more restrictive open licenses. We should achieve what we can when we can. We should not delay achieving free in order to achieve libre, and we should not stop with free when we can achieve libre.
Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
