DEVELOPMENT OF PHYSICAL TEST INSTRUMENTS BASED ON THE CONCEPTUAL KNOWLEDGE DIMENSION OF THE REVISION BLOOM TAXONOMY
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22611/jpf.v8i2.14831Keywords:
Revised Bloom Taxonomy, Conceptual Knowledge, Test DevelopmentAbstract
This study aims to develop a physics test instrument based on the conceptual knowledge dimension of Revised Bloom's Taxonomy on the topic of General Physics that meets the eligibility criteria of a good test instrument, including validity, reliability, level of difficulty, distinguishing power and effectiveness of fraud. This type of research is a Research and Development (R&D) research with the implementation stages of determining the objectives and indicators of test instruments, compilation of lattices and items, feasibility testing, revision and refinement of test instruments. The data of this study were analyzed qualitatively and quantitatively by trying out the physics test instruments developed in the form of 30 multiple choice tests. Based on the results of qualitative analysis of the content validation aspect, the average rating obtained by the validator is 75.6%, meaning that the test is valid with minor revisions. Judging from the results of the quantitative analysis 20 items were obtained valid with reliability in the very high category, and the level of difficulty in the difficult to easy category, while in the aspect of distinguishing 12 items were in the good category, and 8 questions were in the excellent category and viewed from aspects of deception effectiveness obtained 20 items effective so that it can be concluded, as many as 20 items were accepted and declared worthy to be used to train and measure students' conceptual knowledge on the topic of General PhysicsReferences
Arifin, Z. (2010). Evaluasi Pembelajaran: Teori dan Praktik. In Historische Literatur. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800408324210
Arifin, Z. (2012). Evaluasi pembelajaran. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya. https://doi.org/979-692-956-2
Arikunto, S. (2008). Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktik. Jakarta: Rineka Karya.
Boorman, E. D., & Rushworth, M. F. S. (2009). Conceptual Representation and the Making of New Decisions. Neuron. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2009.09.014
Brad, A. (2011). A Study of the Problem Solving Activity in High School Students: Strategies and Self-Regulated Learning. Acta Didactica Napocensia, 4(1), 21“30.
Chavda, P., Misra, S., & Duttaroy, B. (2015). Item analysis of multiple choice questions based undergraduate assessment in community medicine. South-East Asian Journal of Medical Education. https://doi.org/10.4038/seajme.v9i1.101
Djaali, & Muljono, P. (2008). Pengukuran dalam Bidang Pendidikan. Jakarta: Grasindo.
Duschl, R. (2008). Science education in three-part harmony: Balancing conceptual, epistemic, and social learning goals. Review of Research in Education. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X07309371
Erceg, N., MaruÅ¡ić, M., & SliÅ¡ko, J. (2011). Students™ strategies for solving partially specified physics problems. Revista Mexicana de Fisica E.
Fang, S. C., Hsu, Y. S., Chang, H. Y., Chang, W. H., Wu, H. K., & Chen, C. M. (2016). Investigating The Effects of Structured and Guided Inquiry on Students™ Development of Conceptual Knowledge and Inquiry Abilities: A Case Study in Taiwan. Journal of Science Education, 38(12), 1945“1971.
Hadi, S. (2013). Pengembangan Computerized Adaptive Test Berbasis Web. Yogyakarta: Aswaja Pressindo.
Kara, F., & Çelikler, D. (2015). Development of Achievement Test : Validity and Reliability Study for Achievement Test on Matter Changing. Journal of Education and Practice.
Krathwohl, A. and. (2001). A Taxonomy For Learning, Teaching And Assesing. New York: Addison Wesleylongman.
Lichtenberger, A., Wagner, C., Hofer, S. I., Stern, E., & Vaterlaus, A. (2017). Validation and structural analysis of the kinematics concept test. Physical Review Physics Education Research. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.13.010115
Mahaputri, N. L. P., & Dantes, N. (2013). Pengembangan tes prestasi belajar berbasis taksonomi Anderson dan krathwohl pada kompetensi dasar fisika Smk kelas x semester ganjil se-kota singaraja. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Evaluasi Pendidikan Indonesia, 3.
Matondang, Z. (2009). Validitas dan Reliabilitas Suatu Intrumen Penelitian. Jurnal Tabularasa PPS Unimed. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/amm.496-500.1510
Ornek, F., Robinson, W. R., & Haugan, M. P. (2008). What Make Physics Difficult? International Journal of Environmental & Science Education, 3(1), 30“34.
Rahmawati, Rustaman, N. Y., Hamidah, I., & Rusdiana, D. (2018). The Development and Validation of Conceptual Knowledge Test to Evaluate Conceptual Knowledge of Physics Prospective Teachers on Electricity and Magnetism Topic. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 7(4), 483“490.
Rittle-Johnson, B., & Star, J. R. (2009). Compared With What? The Effects of Different Comparisons on Conceptual Knowledge and Procedural Flexibility for Equation Solving. Journal of Educational Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014224
Sadaghiani, H. R., & Pollock, S. J. (2015). Quantum mechanics concept assessment: Development and validation study. Physical Review Special Topics-Physics Education Research, 11(1), 101“110.
Streveler, R. A., Litzinger, T. A., Miller, R. L., & Steif, P. S. (2008). Learning conceptual knowledge in the engineering sciences: Overview and future research directions. Journal of Engineering Education. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2008.tb00979.x
Sugiyono. (2017). Metode Penelitian. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Supranata, S. (2009). Analisis, validities, realibilitas dan interpretasi hasil tes. Jakarta: Erlangga.
Tanjung, Y. I., Panggabean, D. D., & Sudama, T. F. (2018). The Development of The Mathematical Physics Module Based on Self Regulated Learning. International Journal of Sciences : Basic and Applied Research (IJSBAR), 39(1), 11“20.
Walsh, L. N., Howard, R. G., & Bowe, B. (2007). Phenomenographic study of students™ problem solving approaches in physics. Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.3.020108
Wijayanti, P. ., Mosik, & Hindarto, N. (2010). Eksplorasi Kesulitan Belajar Siswa Pada Pokok Bahasan Cahaya dan Upaya Peningkatan Hasil Belajar Melalui Pembelajaran Inkuiri Terbimbing. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Indonesia, 6, 1“5.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2019 Yul Ifda Tanjung
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika allow the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions and allow the author(s) to retain publishing rights without restrictions. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika CC-BY or an equivalent license as the optimal license for the publication, distribution, use, and reuse of scholarly work.
In developing strategy and setting priorities, Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika recognize that free access is better than priced access, libre access is better than free access, and libre under CC-BY or the equivalent is better than libre under more restrictive open licenses. We should achieve what we can when we can. We should not delay achieving free in order to achieve libre, and we should not stop with free when we can achieve libre.
Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
