EFFECT OF COLLABORATIVE INQUIRY LEARNING MODEL TO 4C STUDENT SKILLS IN HIGH SCHOOL
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22611/jpf.v8i1.10639Keywords:
collaborative inquiry, collaboration, communication, critical thinking, creativityAbstract
This study aims to analyze the effect of collaborative inquiry learning models in improving students' 4C (Collaboration, Communication, Critical Thinking and Creativity) skills for learning physics on impulses, momentum and collisions. The population of this study were all students of class X of SMA Negeri 7 Medan in the second semester of the 2017/2018 academic year. The sampling technique in this research used cluster random class, the experimental class used collaborative inquiry learning model and control class using conventional learning. The variables in the study consisted of 4C skills as dependent variables and collaborative inquiry models as independent variables. The data in this study were analyzed using one-party t-test. The results showed that students '4C skills with collaborative inquiry learning models were better than students' 4C skills with conventional learningReferences
Acedo, C and Hughes. C. 2014. Principles For Learning And Competences In The 21st-Century Curriculum. Journal Springer, 44: 503-525
Adams, P. 2016. Preparing Learning Teachers The Role Of Collaborative Inquiry. Canadian Journal Of Action Research, 17 (1), 20-35
Andiliou. A., Murphy, P. K. 2014. Creative Solutions and Their Evaluation Comparing the Effects Of Explanation and Argumentation Tasks on Student Reflections. Frontline Learning Research, 5 (1), 92-114
Arends. 2008. Lerning To Teach. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Bahtiar., Wasis., Rahayu, S. R. 2016. A Guided Inquiry Approach-Based Physics Practice Model To Improve Students Critical Thinking Skill. International Conference On Education (IECO). 1(1) : 96-108
Bailin. S. 2002. Critical thinking and science education. Science & Education, 11(4), 361“375.
Birgili, B. 2015. Creative and Critical Thinking Skills in Problem Based Learning Environments. Journal of Gifted Education and Creativity, 2 (2), 71-80
Brailas. A., Avani. S. M., Gkini. C., Deilogkou. M. A., Koskinas. K. 2017. Experiential Learning in Action: A Collaborative Inquiry. Journal The Qualitative Report, 22 (1): 2-20.
Deta. U. A., Suparmi., Widha. S. 2013. Pengaruh Metode Inkuiri Terbimbing Dan Proyek, Kreativitas, Serta Keterampilan Proses Sains Terhadap Prestasi Belajar Siswa. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Indonesia, 9: 28-34
Donohoo. J. 2011. Collaborative Inquiry A Facilitator™s Guide. Canada : MISA
Ennis. R. H. 1986. Goals for a Critical Thinking Curriculum,. Dalam A. L. Costa (Ed), Developing Minds. Virginia: Association for supervision and Curiculum Development.
Fisher. A. 2008. Berpikir Kritis: Sebuah Pengantar, Terjemahan oleh Benyamin Hadinata. Jakarta: Erlangga.
Fuad. N. M., Zubaidah. S., Mahanal. S., Suarsini. E. 2017. Improving Junior High Schools Critical Thinking Skills Based on Test Three Different Models Of Learning. International Journal Of Instruction, 10 (1): 101-116
Gibson. T. 2017. An Examination Of How Middle School Science Teachers Conduct Collaborative Inquiry And Reflection About Students™ Conceptual Understanding. Contemporary Issues in Education Research, 10 (2): 169-178
Gora, W dan Sunarto. 2009. PAKEMATIK Strategi Pembelajaran Inovatif Berbasis TIK. Jakarta : Elexmedia Komputindo
Henriksen. D., Mishra. P., Fisser. P. 2016. Infusing Creativity and Technology in 21st Century Education: A Systemic View for Change. Educational Technology & Society, 19 (3): 27“37.
Higgins. S. 2014. Critical thinking for 21st-century education: A cyber-tooth curriculum?. Journal Springer, 44: 559-574
Hosnan. 2014. Perdekatan Sainstifik dan Kontekstual dalam Pembelajaran Abad 21. Bogor : Ghalia Indonesia.
Junaedi. M., Sunarno. W., Cari. 2014. Pembelajaran Fisika Melalui Pendekatan Inkuiri Terbimbing Dengan Metode Eksperimen Dan Proyek Ditinjau Dari Aktivitas Dan Sikap Ilmiah Siswa. Jurnal Inkuiri, 3 (3): 41-52
Kasimatis. A., Petropoulou. O., Retalis. S., Dimopoulos. I., Psaromiligkos. I., Karaggelis. K. 2014. Using Moodle And E-Assessment Methods During A Collaborative Inquiry Learning Scenario. Journal Pedagogical and Technological Education, 01: 1-7.
Keane. T., Keane. W. F., Blicblau. A. S. 2014. Beyond traditional literacy: Learning and transformative practices using ICT. Journal Springer Science, 1: 1-13
Ku, K. Y. 2009. Assessing students™ critical thinking performance: Urging for measurements using multi-response format. Thinking Skills and Creativity, (4), 70“76.
Kurniawati. I.D., Wartono, Diantoro. M. 2014. Pengaruh Pembelajaran Inkuiri Terbimbing Integrasi Peer Instruction terhadap Penguasaan Konsep dan Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Siswa, Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Indonesia. 10: 36-46.
Langgeng., Sajidan dan Prayitno. B. A. 2017. Pengembangan Model Pembelajaran Inkuiri Kolaboratif Berbasis Potensi Lokal Dan Implementasinya Pada Materi Tumbuhan Lumut Dan Paku. JURNAL INKUIRI, 6 (1) : 1-16
Lawrie. G. A., Matthews. K. E., Bailey. C., Kavanagh. L. J., Gahan. L. R., Weaver. G. C., Adams. P., Long. P. D. 2014. Technology Supported Facilitation And Assessment Of Small Group Collaborative Inquiry Learning In Large First-Year Classes. Journal of Learning Design, 7(2): 1-16
Mishra. P and Mehta. R. 2017. What We Educators Get Wrong About 21st-Century Learning: Results of a Survey. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 33 (1): 6-19.
Munandar dan Utami. 2009. Mengembangkan Bakat Dan Kreativitas Anak Sekolah, Petunuk Bagi Para Guru Dan Orang Tua. Jakarta : PT. Gramedia Widiasarana Indonesia.
Niana. R., Sarwanto., Ekawati. E.Y. 2016. The Application Of Guided Inquiry Model On Physic Learning To Improve Scientific Attitude And Students Analysis Ability. Proceeding The International Conference On Teacher And Education Sebelas Maret University, 2(1) : 605-615
Paul, R. W., & Elder, L. 2013. Critical Thinking: Intellectual Standards Essential to Reasoning Well Within Every Domain of Human Thought. Journal of Developmental Education, 37(1), 32“36.
Pratiwi. T. R dan Muslim. 2016. Pembelajaran Ipa Tipe Integrated Untuk Meningkatkan Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis Siswa SMP. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Indonesia, 12 (1): 54-64
Quieng. M. C., Lim P. P., Lucas. M. R. D. 2015. 21st Century-based Soft Skills: Spotlight on Non-cognitive Skills in a Cognitive-laden Dentistry Program. European Journal of Contemporary Education, 11 (1): 72-81
Roekel, D. V. 2011. Preparing 21st Century Students For a Global Society An Educator™s Guide to the œFour Cs. National Education Association: Canada
Sam, C., Tavares, N. J., Donna, C., Ho Shun, Y., Ken, C., Felix, S., Mona, W. 2012. Developing Upper Primary Students 21St Century Skills. Hongkong: Quality Education Fund
Sani, R. A. 2014. Pembelajaran Saintifik Untuk Implementasi Kurikulum 2013. Bumi Aksara: Jakarta
Sani, R. A. 2016. Penilaian Autentik. Bumi Aksara: Jakarta
Saputri, A. C., Sajidan., Rinanto. Y. 2017. Identifikasi Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis Siswa Dalam Pembelajaran Biologi Menggunakan Window Shopping. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Sains (SNPS), 1 (1): 131-135
Scott, C. L. 2015. The Futures Of Learning 2: What Kind Of Learning For The 21st Century?. Education Research And Foresight Working Papers UNESCO, 1-14
Simbolon, D. H., Sahyar. 2015. Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Inkuiri Terbimbing Berbasis Eksperimen Rill Dan Laboratorium Virtual Terhadap Hasil Belajar Fisika Siswa. Journal Pendidikan Dan Kebudayaan, 21(3) : 299-315
Siswanto., Kaniawati, I., Suhandi, A. 2014. Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Pembangkit Argumen Menggunakan Metode Saintifik Untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Kognitif Dan Keterampilan Berargumentasi Siswa. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Indonesia, 10 (2): 104-116.
Susilawati., Ristanto, S., khoiri, N. 2015. Pembelajaran Real Laboratory Dan Tugas Mandiri Fisika Pada Siswa Smk Sesuai Dengan Keterampilan Abad 21. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Indonesia, 11 (1):73-83
Susilo. 2015. Curriculum of EFL Teacher Education and Indonesian Qualification Framework: A Blip of the Future Direction. Jurnal Dinamika Ilmu, 15 (1): 11-24
Stoll, L. 2010. Connecting Learning Communities: Capacity Building For Systematic Change, In A. Hargreaves, A. Lieberman, M. Fullan, & D. Hopkins (Eds.). Second international handbook of educational change. Dordrecht, Springer: International Handbook of Education, 23 (1): 469-484
Torrance, E. P. 1990. Torrance tests of creative thinking verbal forms A and B: Manual for scoring and interpreting results. Benseville, IL: Scholastic Testing Service.
Williams. M. C. 2015. Exploring the Benefits of a Collaborative Inquiry Team in Education (CITE) Initiative to Develop a Research Community and Enhance Student Engagement. Brock Education Journal, 25 (1): 55-72
Watson, G. B., & Glaser, E. M. 1980. Watson-Glaser critical thinking manual. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation, Hartcourt Brace.
Yuliati, Y. 2017. Literasi Sains Dalam Pembelajaran Ipa. Jurnal Cakrawala Pendas, 3 (2): 21-28.
Zubaidah, S. 2016. Keterampilan Abad Ke-21: Keterampilan Yang Diajarkan Melalui Pembelajaran. Journal Universitas Negeri Malang, 1 (1): 1-17
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2019 Hani Diana Sipayung
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika allow the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions and allow the author(s) to retain publishing rights without restrictions. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika CC-BY or an equivalent license as the optimal license for the publication, distribution, use, and reuse of scholarly work.
In developing strategy and setting priorities, Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika recognize that free access is better than priced access, libre access is better than free access, and libre under CC-BY or the equivalent is better than libre under more restrictive open licenses. We should achieve what we can when we can. We should not delay achieving free in order to achieve libre, and we should not stop with free when we can achieve libre.
Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
