ADAPTASI ALAT UKUR DATING ANXIETY SCALE FOR ADOLESCENTS (DAS-A) VERSI BAHASA INDONESIA

Authors

  • Hurun Iin Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Jl. Dr. Setiabudi No.229, Bandung, Indonesia
  • Kartini Kartini Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Jl. Dr. Setiabudi No.229, Bandung, Indonesia
  • Ovella Livta Viella Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Jl. Dr. Setiabudi No.229, Bandung, Indonesia
  • Vlarisa Vlarisa Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Jl. Dr. Setiabudi No.229, Bandung, Indonesia
  • Diah Zaleha Wyandini Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Jl. Dr. Setiabudi No.229, Bandung, Indonesia
  • Ghinaya Ummul Mukminin Hidayat Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Jl. Dr. Setiabudi No.229, Bandung, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24114/jkss.v22i2.64490

Keywords:

dating, anxiety, reliability, validity, scale

Abstract

Dating anxiety is a phenomenon commonly experienced during dating. Although much research has been conducted on dating anxiety measurement tools abroad, the adaptation of these tools in Indonesian cultural context remains limited. Therefore, this study aims to examine the reliability and validity of the Dating Anxiety Scale for Adolescents adapted in Indonesia. The measurement scale consists of 21 items assessing 3 dimensions namely Fear of Negative Evaluation, Social Distress-Dating, and Social Distress-Group. The study involved 202 respondents aged 18-30 years in Indonesia. The results of confirmatory factor analysis indicated that the model did not fully fit the data, such as chi-square value of 531.790, CFI 0.770, TLI 0.739, and NFI 0.701, which did not meet the standard fit criteria. However, the reliability test results with Cronbach’s Alpha coefficient showed a significant value of 0.909, indicating this measurement tool has good internal consistency and can be relied upon to measure dating anxiety.

References

Adamczyk, K., Morelli, N. M., Segrin, C., Jiao, J., Park, J. Y., & Villodas, M. T. (2022). Psychometric Analysis of the Dating Anxiety Scale for Adolescents in Samples of Polish and U.S. Young Adults: Examining the Factor Structure, Measurement Invariance, Item Functioning, and Convergent Validity. Assessment. https://doi.org/10.1177/10731911211017659

Annisa, D. F., & Ifdil, I. (2016). Konsep Kecemasan (Anxiety) pada Lanjut Usia (Lansia). Konselor. https://doi.org/10.24036/02016526480-0-00

Azwar, S. (2010). Metode penelitian. Pustaka Pelajar.

Brown, T. A. (2015). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. Guilford publications.

Byrne, B. (2016). Structural equation modeling with AMOS:Basic Concepts, Applications, and Programming (multivariate applications series). In New York: Taylor & Francis Group.

Cheung, G. W., & Rensvold, R. B. (2002). Cheungrensvold02.Pdf. Structural Equation Modeling, 9(2), 233–255.

Chorney, D. B., & Morris, T. L. (2008). The changing face of dating anxiety: Issues in assessment with special populations. In Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2850.2008.00132.x

Christensen, L. B. (2007). Experimental methodology tenth edition. Boston: Pearson Education.

Creswell, J. W. (2003). Research design Qualitative quantitative and mixed methods approaches. Sage publications. https://doi.org/10.3109/08941939.2012.723954

Creswell, J. W. (2018). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. SAGE Publications.

Ebel, R. L., & Frisbie, D. A. (1991). Essentials of educational measurement (5th ed.). Prentice-Hall.

Eprila, E., Kusumawaty, I., & Yunike, Y. (2023). Kecemasan Calon Pengantin dalam Menghadapi Pernikahan. Journal of Telenursing (JOTING). https://doi.org/10.31539/joting.v5i1.5830

Glickman, A. R., & La Greca, A. M. (2004). The Dating Anxiety Scale for Adolescents: Scale development and associations with adolescent functioning. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15374424jccp3303_14

Guilford, J. P. (1956). Fundamental statistics in psychology and education (3rd ed.). McGraw-Hill Book Company. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0770451800050569

Hair J. F, Anderson, R. E., Babin, B. J., & Black, W. C. (2010). Multivariate data analysis: A global perspective (Vol. 7). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.

Hair, J. F., Willliam, C. B., Barry, J. B., & Rolph, E. A. (2019). Multivariate Data Analysis. 8th Edition. United Kingdom: Cengage Learning EMEA.

Indria, G. A., & Intarti, W. D. (2023). Intervensi Kecemasan Akademik pada Mahasiswa Peminatan Kesehatan: Literature Review. Jurnal Publikasi Kebidanan.

Kline, R. B. (2018). Response to Leslie Hayduk’s review of principles and practice of structural equation modeling,1 4th edition. Canadian Studies in Population, 45(3–4), 188–195. https://doi.org/10.25336/csp29418

Mukminina, M., & Abidin, Z. (2020). Coping Kecemasan Siswa SMA dalam Menghadapi Ujian Tulis Berbasis Komputer (UTBK) Tahun 2019. JURNAL Al-AZHAR INDONESIA SERI HUMANIORA. https://doi.org/10.36722/sh.v5i3.370

Nugroho, A., & Maria, A. (2022). Efek kualitas layanan, lingkungan sosial dan finansial, terhadap motivasi, kepuasan, finansial, lingkungan sosial, dan kinerja atlet puslatda PON. Jurnal Pendidikan Olahraga dan Kesehatan, 5(1), 1–10.

Puțaru, A. I., & Rusu, A. S. (2021). Investigation of the relationship between dating anxiety, self-esteem and social connectedness in emerging adults. Journal of Educational Sciences & Psychology, 11(2). https://doi.org/10.51865/jesp.2021.2.12

Putri, S. W., Suminta, R. R., & Handayani, D. (2022). HUBUNGAN EFIKASI DIRI DENGAN KECEMASAN MENGHADAPI UJIAN NASIONAL PADA SISWA. Happiness, Journal of Psychology and Islamic Science. https://doi.org/10.30762/happiness.v1i2.334

Sahputra, D., Habibah, P., & Fitria, D. (2023). Munculnya Kecemasan Sosial sebagai Masalah Kesehatan Mental pada Pengguna Media Sosial. CARAKA : Indonesia Journal of Communication. https://doi.org/10.25008/caraka.v4i1.86

Sari, D. P., & Wulandari, D. (2021). Analisis faktor instrumen pengukuran motivasi berprestasi pada mahasiswa. Jurnal Psikologi Sosial, 20(1), 72–86

Sugiyono. (2013). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Metode Penelitian Pendidikan Pendekatan Kuantitaif, Kualitatif, Dan R&D.

Sumadi, S. (2005). Pengembangan Alat Ukur Psikologi. Penerbit Andi Yogyakarta.

Suryabrata, S. (2000). Metode penelitian. PT Raja Grafindo Persada.

Suryantoro, B., Punama, D. W., & Haqi, M. (2020). Jurnal Baruna Horizon Vol . 3 , No . 1 Juni 2020. Jurnal Baruna Horizon, 3(1), 156–169.

Swami, V., Robinson, C., & Furnham, A. (2021). Associations between body image, social physique anxiety, and dating anxiety in heterosexual emerging adults. Body Image. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2021.10.004

Utari, D., & Lestari, R. (2023). Metode adaptasi lintas budaya instrumen Kidscreen-27 di Asia: Integrative review. Jambura Journal of Health Science and Research, 5(2), 474–480

Wardani, N. (2022). Pengaruh Kecemasan Matematika terhadap Hasil Belajar Siswa SMA Kelas X. NUCLEUS. https://doi.org/10.37010/nuc.v3i2.992

Zaider, T. I., Heimberg, R. G., & Iida, M. (2010). Anxiety Disorders and Intimate Relationships: A Study of Daily Processes in Couples. Journal of Abnormal Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018473

Downloads

Published

2024-12-30

How to Cite

Iin, H., Kartini, K., Viella, O. L., Vlarisa, V., Wyandini, D. Z., & Hidayat, G. U. M. (2024). ADAPTASI ALAT UKUR DATING ANXIETY SCALE FOR ADOLESCENTS (DAS-A) VERSI BAHASA INDONESIA. JURNAL KELUARGA SEHAT SEJAHTERA, 22(2), 96–109. https://doi.org/10.24114/jkss.v22i2.64490

Issue

Vol. 22 No. 2 (2024): JURNAL KELUARGA SEHAT SEJAHTERA

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2024 JURNAL KELUARGA SEHAT SEJAHTERA

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.