A SEMANTIC ANALYSIS ON ENTAILMENT FOUND IN THE MOVIE œMOANA

Authors

  • Liza Muharina Bayazid Universitas Negeri Medan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24114/lt.v20i3.58566

Keywords:

Semantic, Entailment, Movie, Dialogue

Abstract

This research is under the scope of Semantics. The aims of this study are (1) to analysis the types of entailment and (2) to describe the orders of entailment found in the movie Moana (2016) and to describe the order of entailment applied in the movie Moana (2016). This research employed descriptive qualitative method. This research aimed at describing the language which is used in the movie Moana (2016). This research attempts to describe by using of proposed by Griffiths (2023) and Crouch (2003) theory as a theory of types of entailment found in the movie Moana (2016).  Therefore, the data of this research study is the transcription of the script movie Moana (2016). In this research, the form of the data was sentences in spoken language which is uttered in the movie. The sentences uttered can be in the context of dialogues with other characters or monologues. The results of the analysis showed from the total 20 data, one-way entailment type was found 8 times (40%), two-way entailment 5 times (25%), and metaphorical entailment 7 times (35%). Compared to another types of entailment, one-way entailment is most dominantly used of entailment. One-way entailment is on the highest rank since it is the most common entailment uttered by people. Two-way involvement can be seen in two or more sentences that have the exact same meaning. It was an idea that was said over and over again. In Moana's speech, every metaphorical implication consists of a metaphorical image and its meaning.

References

Auerbach, Carl F. and Louise B. Silverstein. 2003. Qualitative Data: An Introduction to Coding and Analysis. New York: New York University Press.

Baroni, Marco, Raffaella Bernardi, Ngoc-Quynh Do and Chung-Chieh Shan. 2012. Entailment above the Word Level in Distributional Semantics. Association for Computational Linguistics, p. 23“32.

Blass, Regina. 1990. Relevance Relations in Discourse: A Study with Special Reference to Sissala. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Borg, Emma. 2006. Minimal Semantics. New York: Oxford University Press Ltd.

Brinton, Laurel J. 2000. The Structure of Modern English: A Linguistic Introduction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.

Carston, Robyn. 2008. Linguistic Communications and the Semantics/Pragmatics Distinction. Synthese, 165, III, p. 321-45.

Crouch, Richard. 2003. Scalability of Redundancy Detection in Focused Document Collections. Berlin: Cascadilla Press.

Denscombe, Martyn. 2007. The Good Research Guide: For Small-scale Social Research Projects. 3th Edition. New York: Open University Press.

Fromkin, Victoria, Robert Rodman, and Nina Hyams. 2003. An Introduction to Language. 7th Edition. Boston: Thomson Wadsworth.

Given, Lisa M. 2008. The SAGE Encyclopedia of Qualitative Research Method. Vol. 1&2. Los Angeles: A SAGE Reference Publication.

Griffiths, Patrick. 2023. An Introduction to English Semantics and Pragmatics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press Ltd.

Hancock, Beverley. 2002. An Introduction to Qualitative Research. Nottingham: Trent Focus Group.

Harley, T.revor A. 2010. Talking the Talk: Language, Psychology and Science. New York: Psychology Press.

Horn, Laurence R and Gregory Ward. 2006. Handbook of Pragmatics. Oxford: Blackwell Publisher Ltd.

Hurford, James R. and Brendan Heasley. 2007. Semantics: A Coursebook. 2 nd Edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Kovecses, Zoltan. 2002. Metaphor: A Practical Introduction. 2nd Edition. New York: Oxford University Press.

Kreidler, Charles W. 1998. Introducing English Semantics. London: Routledge.

Kwantes, Peter J. 2005. œUsing Context to Build Semantics. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 12, IV, p. 703-10.

Lyons, John. 1977. Semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Martadina, Vike. 2013. Semantic Interpretation of the Utterances Produced by the Characters in Elaine Hopper™s Short Story œBrazen. Thesis. Semarang: Faculty of Language and Cultural Studies, University of Stikubank Semarang.

Published

2024-05-27