The Development of Animal Physiology Textbook Based on Higher Order Thinking Skills for Biology Department Students

Authors

  • Indra Jaya Purba Universitas Negeri Medan
  • Melva Silitonga Universitas Negeri Medan
  • Idramsa Idramsa Universitas Negeri Medan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24114/jpb.v11i2.33654

Keywords:

Animal Physiology, Textbook, 4D Development

Abstract

The students™ higher order thinking skills were still low due to the learning system, such as the use of textbooks that have not led to an increase in higher order thinking skills. The availability of updated textbooks based on higher order thinking skills was needed in the university. The aim of this study was to develop a textbook based on higher order thinking skills on animal physiology course. The development model used in this study was the Thiagarajan (4D) development model which consisted of define, design, development and dissemination. However, the research stage carried out was only up to development. The developed textbook was validated based on three criterias, namely material, language and design. The developed textbook was also tested to students who have taken animal physiology course and obtained the students™ response. The result of validation by material expert was 86 in the category of œVery Good, language expert was 88 in the category of œVery Good, design expert was 87 in the category of œVery Good and students™ response according to individually, small group and limited group were 86, 89 and 89 respectively. The whole students™ responses were categorized as œVery Good. It can be concluded that the product can be used as a textbook in animal physiology course. This study is useful as a learning source for students and an alternative teaching material for lecturers, as well as improving the quality of animal physiology learning.

References

Anderson, L. W., Krathwohl, D. R., Airasian, P. W., Cruikshank, K. A., Mayer, R. E., Pintrich, P. R., Raths, J., & Wittrock, M. C. (2001). A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing A Revision of Bloom™s Taxonomy oF Educational Objectives. New York: Longman.

Gunada, I. W., Ayub, S., Doyan, A., Verawati, N. N. S. P., & Hikmawati, H. (2021). Pengembangan Buku Ajar Sejarah Fisika Berbasis Higher Order Thingking Skill (HOTS). Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika dan Teknologi, 7(1), 59“65. https://doi.org/10.29303/jpft.v7i1.2767.

Habibi, M., Suarsini, E., & Amin, M. (2016). Pengembangan Buku Ajar Matakuliah Mikrobiologi Dasar. Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, dan Pengembangan, 1(5), 890“900.

Hasmunarti, H., Bahri, A., & Idris, I. S. (2019). Analisis Kebutuhan Pengembangan Blended Learning Terintegrasi Strategi PBLRQA (Problem-Based Learning and Reading, Questioning & Answering) pada Pembelajaran Biologi. Biology Teaching and Learning, 1(2), 101“108. https://doi.org/10.35580/btl.v1i2.8177.

Isbandiyah, S., & Sanusi, A. (2019). Modul Penyusunan Soal Keterampilan Tingkat Tinggi (Higher Order Thinking Skills) Biologi (L. Hadi (ed.)). Jakarta: Kementrian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.

Juwita, T., Ilmiyati, N., & Maladona, A. (2017). Analisis Kelayakan Buku Teks Siswa IPA Kurikulum 2013 Pada Materi Sistem Pencernaan Kelas VIII Untuk Digunakan Dalam Proses Pembelajaran Ditinjau Dari Relevansi Isi, Ketepatan dan Kompleksitas. Jurnal Bio Educatio, 2(1), 63“70.

Lazarowitz, R., & Penso, S. (1992). High School Students™ Difficulties in Learning Biology Concepts. Journal of Biological Education, 26(3), 215“223. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.1992.9655276.

Lembaga Penelitian Universitas Trisakti. (2020). Pedoman Penyusunan dan Pengusulan Hibah Buku Ajar Universitas Trisakti. Jakarta: Universitas Trisakti.

LKPP Unhas. (2015). Bahan Ajar, Buku Ajar, Modul, dan Panduan Praktik. Makassar: Universitas Hasanuddin.

Marada, R., Nusantari, E., & Dama, L. (2021). Pengembangan Instrumen Berbasis Higher Order Thinking Skiil ( HOTS ) untuk Melatih Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Siswa pada Mata Pelajaran Biologi. Jurnal Normalita, 9(2), 188“194.

Maulina, D., & Amin, M. (2016). Analisis Kebutuhan Bahan Ajar Mata Kuliah Fisiologi Hewan di Universitas Lampung. Prosiding Seminar Nasional II 2016, Kerjasama Prodi Pendidikan Biologi FKIP Dengan Pusat Studi Lingkungan dan Kependudukan (PSLK) Universitas Muhammadiya Malang, 1072“1076.

Prasetiyo, N. A., & Perwiraningtyas, P. (2017). Pengembangan Buku Ajar Berbasis Lingkungan Hidup Pada Matakuliah Biologi di Universitas

Tribhuwana Tunggadewi. Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia, 3(1), 19“27.

Probowati, A., Gofur, A., & Lukiati, B. (2020). Analisis Kebutuhan untuk Pengembangan Bahan Ajar Fisiologi Hewan dan Manusia pada Jurusan Biologi. Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, dan Pengembangan, 5(6), 743“748. https://doi.org/10.17977/jptpp.v5i6.13586.

Safitri, D. & Hartati, T. A. W. (2016). Kelayakan Aspek Media dan Bahasa dalam Pengembangan Buku Ajar dan Multimedia Interaktif Biologi Sel. Florea, 3(2), 9“14.

Thiagarajan, S., Semmel, D. S., & Semmel, M. I. (1974). Instructional Development for Training Teachers of Exceptional Children: A Sourcebook. Bloomington: Indiana University.

Ulandari, T., & Syamsurizal, S. (2021). Booklet Suplemen Bahan Ajar pada Materi Protista untuk Kelas X SMA/MA. Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengembangan Pendidikan, 5(2), 301“307.

Wibowo, W. (2016). Penulisan Buku Ajar Perguruan Tinggi: Hakikat, Formulasi, dan Problem Etisnya. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.

Downloads

Published

2022-08-14