Analysis of Items for Selection of High School Biology Olympics Participants

Authors

  • Ahmad Subari Biology Education Study Program, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Universitas Negeri Padang, Jl. Prof. Dr. Hamka, Padang, 25171, West Sumatra, Indonesia
  • Zulyusri Zulyusri Biology Education Study Program, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Universitas Negeri Padang, Jl. Prof. Dr. Hamka, Padang, 25171, West Sumatra, Indonesia
  • Violita Violita Biology Education Study Program, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Universitas Negeri Padang, Jl. Prof. Dr. Hamka, Padang, 25171, West Sumatra, Indonesia
  • Restu Fitriani Program Studi Biologi, Fakultas Matematika dan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam, Universitas Negeri Malang, Jl. Semarang 5, Malang, 65145, Jawa Timur, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24114/jpb.v10i1.23183

Keywords:

Anates Program, Biology Olympics Questions, Evaluation, Item Analysis

Abstract

Based on observations at school, the teacher has not analyzed the items for the biology Olympics selection that will be tested on the participants. This study aims to determine the quality of the questions of the MAN Model Biology Olympics in Jambi City. This research is a quantitative descriptive study with the subject of class X students participating in the biology Olympics training. Data were obtained through test instruments in the form of multiple choice questions, answer sheets, and answer keys. The data analysis technique used Anates 4.0.9 program. The results showed the level of validity at the coefficient level of 5%, namely, valid questions amounted to 13 questions and 27 questions invalid. At the level of reliability obtained a value of 0.46 with a sufficient category. At the level of difficulty, there are 3 questions that are categorized as easy, 16 are categorized as medium, and 21 are categorized as difficult. Then on the discriminatory power there are 7 questions categorized as very good, 12 categorized as good, 7 categorized as bad and 14 categorized as very bad. Furthermore, in the distractor quality analysis, there are 4 questions with very good and good distractor quality, while the rest have distractor qualities in the criteria of poor, bad, and very bad. Based on the results of the item analysis recap, there is 1 question that can be used directly, 12 questions can be used but need to be improved and 27 questions cannot be used.

References

Alpusari, M. (2014). Analisis Butir Soal Konsep Dasar IPA 1 Melalui Penggunaan Program Komputer Anates Versi 4.0 For Windows. Jurnal Primary Program Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar Fakultas Keguruan Dan Ilmu Pendidikan Universitas Riau, 3(2), 106“115. http://dx.doi.org/10.33578/jpfkip.v3i2.2501

Arifin, Z. (2012). Evaluasi Pembelajaran Penulis. In Direktorat Jenderal Pendidikan Islam Kementerian Agama RI.

Arifin, Z. (2014). Evaluasi pembelajaran. In Pipih Latifah (Ed.), Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya. PT Remaja Rosdakarya Offset.

Arikunto, S. (2005). Dasar-dasar Evaluasi Pendidikan (Edisi Revisi). Bumi Aksara.

Asrul, Ananda, R., & Rosinta. (2014). Evaluasi Pembajalaran. In Citapustaka Media. Citapustaka Media.

Elviana. (2020). Analisis Butir Soal Evaluasi Pembelajaran Pendidikan Agama Islam Menggunakan Program Anates. Jurnal Mudarrisuna, 10(2), 58“74. http://dx.doi.org/10.22373/jm.v10i2.7839

Fitrianawati, M. (2015). Peran analisis butir soal guna meningkatkan kualitas butir soal, kompetensi guru dan hasil belajar peserta didik. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pendidikan PGSD UMS & HDPGSDI Wilayah Jawa, 5(3), 282-295

Friatma, A., Syamsurizal, & Helendra. (2017). Analisis Kualitas Soal Ujian Akhir Semester Genap Mata Pelajaran Biologi Kelas XI IPA SMA Negeri Wilayah Selatan Kabupaten Solok Tahun Pelajaran 2015 / 2016 Analyzed Quality Question of Final Exam Whole Semester on Biology Course Class XI IPA SMA Negeri D. Bioeducation Journal, 1(2), 50“67. https://doi.org/10.24036/bioedu.v1i2.43

Haryanto. (2020). Evaluasi pembelajaran; Konsep dan Manajemen. In UNY Press.

Putri, R. H., & Ofianto. (2019). Efektivitas Analisis Butir Menggunakan Anajohn, Anates Dan Iteman Studi Soal USBN Pelajaran Sejarah Kota Padang. Jurnal Mahasiswa Ilmu Sejarah Dan Pendidikan, 1(2), 1“11.

Ratnawulan, E., & Rusdiana, A. (2014). Evaluasi Pembelajaran. Pustaka Setia Bandung.

Sani, R. A. (2016). Penilaian Autentik (R. D. Aningtyas (ed.); Pertama). PT Bumi Aksara.

Syafti, N. K., Darussyamsu, R., Selaras, G. H., & Syamsurizal, S. (2019). Analyzed Quality Question Type Multiple Choices Questions (MCQ) of Final Exam Even Semester on Biology Course Class XI SMA Negeri Se-Kecamatan IV Jurai Academic Year 2017/2018. Atrium Pendidikan Biologi, 4(1), 200“210.

Syarif, E. A., & Syamsurizal, S. (2019). Analyzed Quality of Senior High School Biology Olympics Questions at West Sumatera, Riau, Jambi, and Bengkulu in 2018. Bioeducation Journal, 3(2), 142“150. https://doi.org/10.24036/bioedu.v3i2.194

Published

2021-06-15